John Adams was watching from the back of the room when James Otis Jr. argued against British writs of assistance in 1761. These were general warrants giving royal officials unlimited authority to ...
WASHINGTON – Conservative Republicans have a three-word response to government demands to spy on Americans' telecommunications: "Get a warrant." When it comes to the same government breaking into ...
The Fourth Amendment protects us from unreasonable search and seizures of our person, our house, our papers, and our effects. In many cases, this amendment governs our interactions with the police.
Some of the recent legal challenges to the use of surveillance by the Department of Homeland Security upon Americans have resulted in the revelation of truly terrifying behavior by the government, in ...
Although the government has developed many ways of using new technologies to gather information about people, the U.S. Supreme Court has only begun to consider how the Fourth Amendment applies to them ...
In Chatrie v. United States, the Supreme Court held that the government's request for user Location History data through a geofence warrant constituted a "search" under the Fourth Amendment. The ...
On April 27th, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Chatrie v. United States, on the Fourth Amendment implications of geofencing. I have already posted the amicus brief I wrote for the Court ...
Add Yahoo as a preferred source to see more of our stories on Google. John Adams was watching from the back of the room when James Otis Jr. argued against British writs of assistance in 1761. These ...
John Adams was watching from the back of the room when James Otis Jr. argued against British writs of assistance in 1761. These were general warrants giving royal officials unlimited authority to ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results