New clinical data from the STEM-PD Phase I/II clinical trial have been presented at the ISSCR 2026 Annual Meeting. The study reports 12-month outcomes evaluating a cryopreserved, off-the-shelf ...

The US Supreme Court has ruled that the Fourth Amendment protects smartphone location history. In a 6–3 decision in Chatrie v. United States, the Court decided that when police obtain historical ...

Law enforcement officials frequently draw virtual fences around areas of interest and require Google to identify every cellphone in the area using cell location history. Dubbed a “geofence search,” ...

(The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.) Anne Toomey McKenna, Penn State (THE CONVERSATION) Law enforcement officials ...

Add Yahoo as a preferred source to see more of our stories on Google. Police obtained cellphone data for many people who happened to be in this area near the time of a bank robbery. AP Photo/Steve ...

The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that accessing someone's phone location history is a Fourth Amendment search, regardless of which company stores the data. Photo: Google Gemini/ Cult of Mac Because it’s ...

In another landmark decision on Monday, the Supreme Court ruled that law enforcement agencies must first obtain a warrant before sweeping up smartphone location data from third-party tech companies ...

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that people have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their cellphone location data, making it generally subject to Fourth Amendment protections. The decision said ...

In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that police conduct a Fourth Amendment search when they obtain a person’s detailed cellphone location history from a tech company, even when the data covers ...

The Supreme Court placed limits on a law enforcement investigative technique that leverages data on cell phone users’ location history to identify people near a crime scene. The justices in a 6-3 ...

The Supreme Court on Monday ruled that the use of a “geofence warrant” to capture location data from cell phones in search of a robbery suspect constituted a search for Fourth Amendment purposes, a ...